Skip to content

Conversation

@piotrzajac
Copy link
Collaborator

@piotrzajac piotrzajac commented Apr 24, 2025

Use [NoEnumeration] to prevent the false positive "Possible multiple enumeration" code inspection.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Improved static analysis support by adding an attribute to prevent unintended enumeration of method parameters. No changes to user-facing functionality.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 24, 2025

Walkthrough

A JetBrains.Annotations using directive was added, and the [NoEnumeration] attribute was applied to the items parameter of the ToTypedArray extension method in EnumerableExtensions.cs. This change informs static analysis tools that the IEnumerable parameter should not be enumerated within the method. No changes were made to the method's logic or control flow.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
src/Objectivity.AutoFixture.XUnit2.Core/Common/EnumerableExtensions.cs Added JetBrains.Annotations using directive and applied [NoEnumeration] attribute to a parameter

Poem

A sprinkle of attributes, a gentle new rule,
No enumeration here, says the annotation tool.
With JetBrains in tow, our code’s more precise,
Static analysis bunnies think this is quite nice!
🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f095f36 and 42ab562.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/Objectivity.AutoFixture.XUnit2.Core/Common/EnumerableExtensions.cs (2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • src/Objectivity.AutoFixture.XUnit2.Core/Common/EnumerableExtensions.cs
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (8)
  • GitHub Check: build-test-pack (AutoFakeItEasy) / run
  • GitHub Check: build-test-pack (AutoMoq) / run
  • GitHub Check: build-test-pack (Core) / run
  • GitHub Check: build-test-pack (AutoNSubstitute) / run
  • GitHub Check: scan (csharp)
  • GitHub Check: scan
  • GitHub Check: scan
  • GitHub Check: test
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Apr 24, 2025

⚠️ Please install the 'codecov app svg image' to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (220b253) to head (42ab562).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master      #254   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           39        39           
  Lines          424       424           
  Branches        55        55           
=========================================
  Hits           424       424           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 99.76% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@piotrzajac piotrzajac merged commit 34e5d51 into master Apr 24, 2025
17 checks passed
@piotrzajac piotrzajac deleted the fix/possible-multiple-enumeration branch April 24, 2025 12:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants